6 comments

  • ramon156 1 hour ago
    If your introduction message already includes a bunch of uncurated claims and LLM smells, then what does that say about the code I'm about to run?
  • mollerhoj 1 hour ago
    Its a bit confusing to claim that "The things your current stack can't give you because it doesn't own the DAG" and use DataBricks as your example: DataBricks includes jobs and pipelines, so it very much owns the DAG, no?
  • hasyimibhar 2 hours ago
    Looks cool, I've been waiting for someone to build this since dbt and SQLMesh acquisition. It would be great to have model versioning and support for ClickHouse SQL.
    • hugocorreia90 0 minutes ago
      Thanks. On model versioning — what's the use case you have in mind? A few options that map to different designs:

      - dbt-style semantic-layer versions (v1/v2 of a model) - schema migration history - branch-based (Rocky already has branches + replay)

      Different design choice for each, so it helps to know which problem you're trying to solve.

      ClickHouse is tractable through the Adapter SDK without engine patching. If you can share roughly your model count and workload shape, I can put a real timeline on it. Open to community PRs too.

  • mergisi 2 hours ago
    * * *