16 comments

  • hedgehog 5 hours ago
    I wanted to see some pictures, this paper has good ones:

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.10332

    If you put your finger in front of a garden slug it may try to eat it, it's a very odd sand-paper sensation but I never knew why.

    • horacemorace 4 hours ago
      Garden snails around seattle will absolutely bite you (teeny tiny bite) and draw blood if you let them crawl around on your skin.
    • deepsun 5 hours ago
      "try"? If it's harder than your skin it means it did, not tried.
      • xboxnolifes 4 minutes ago
        Just because you succeeded doesn't mean you didn't try.
      • hedgehog 4 hours ago
        It may have gotten a nibble but empirically I still have a finger :)
        • dylan604 2 hours ago
          Doesn't mean you were not bitten though.
      • ozyschmozy 1 hour ago
        A steel door is certainly harder than my skin and also certainly can't be used to "bite" me or puncture my skin (save for crushing it given enough force)
      • jayd16 2 hours ago
        Just because it's harder doesn't mean it necessarily has the strength to tear off skin.
    • Sharlin 5 hours ago
      Analogous to the keratinous denticles in a cat tongue, just much smaller in scale.
    • aiisjustanif 4 hours ago
      Well that was more disturbing than I thought it would be.
  • ziofill 5 hours ago
    > Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar

    What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.

    • zapkyeskrill 1 hour ago
      But everyone knows, by experience, what 3300 individual roughly one pound bags of sugar weighs and what sort of force is needed to hold it up. Mid sized car is ambiguous, and nobody saw anybody hold that up (seeing hulk doesn't count)
      • jaapz 37 minutes ago
        You think people are better at estimating what 3300 bags of sugar look like - as opposed to estimating the size of a car?

        How often has anyone ever seen 3300 bags of sugar together in their lives, do you think?

      • saberience 1 hour ago
        Do they? I don't recall ever seeing a bag of sugar in my life. I'm not a baker though so maybe that explains it.

        A car is more easier to picture for me.

        • ninalanyon 52 minutes ago
          You must be from the US.
          • dmoy 20 minutes ago
            I am from the US and buy bags of sugar.

            What else does sugar come in? If not bags? I don't think I've ever bought sugar in something other than a bag.

    • sph 1 hour ago
      Mid-sized European or American car?
    • IshKebab 2 hours ago
      > 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar

      Woah that must weigh almost 3,301 pounds!

      • sph 1 hour ago
        No, it’s 3,300 £1 bags of sugar, with undefined weight
    • flippyhead 2 hours ago
      Must be a british thing?
      • natebc 1 hour ago
        well that's just £3300 then, yeah?
        • tucnak 1 hour ago
          Half that, 3300 pounds of sugar is roughly 1800 quid (retail) and wholesale is probably half of that.
          • natebc 55 minutes ago
            Well that's what ... 300 or so pints?
            • dmoy 19 minutes ago
              Wait beer in the UK is 11 quid per pint??? I know UK pints are bigger, but that seems really pricey
    • echelon 1 hour ago
      I can't wait until our LLM agents spot these and substitute in our own favorite, personally intuitive format conversions appropriate for the scale.

      I'd like this to be expressed in units of pallet(s) of standard cinder blocks.

  • bilsbie 39 minutes ago
    They say they’re taking about tensile strength at the footnote. But teeth would be more likely to be compressively strong. They don’t get pulled on much.

    The whole thing seems very confused. Anyway let’s build space elevator?

  • RajT88 5 hours ago
    > 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar

    Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold??

    Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".

    • loloquwowndueo 5 hours ago
      Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement
      • fnordpiglet 5 hours ago
        It’s a real condition. For me it’s jet liners of various makes. I had to rewrite the quote as “0.005 Boeing 777’s” to be able to comprehend just how strong those snails teeth are.
        • eth0up 5 hours ago
          Sorry, but that's what 14 (standard) pickup trucks of yak hair was invented for.
          • djtriptych 4 hours ago
            ok but what color is the yak hair?
            • thenewwazoo 3 hours ago
              Same color as the bike shed, obviously
            • eth0up 2 hours ago
              Not from Unitzikstan I see

              White, of course; that way the statisticians can dye them any color they want. But for ultra high precision I do recommend the Boeing system. But be sure to use the older models, before private equity firms replaced all the metal parts with zipties. If you can't find a quality Boeing (plausible), consider 1.1 Blue Whales (tricky).

              fnordpiglet was being deliberately humble with the decimals. It's accurate down to the semi firkin. Not to be confused with a quarter Tod.

              Ignore the redundant bike shed comment, as that fits precisely 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar. Anyone with a bike should know that.

      • rz2k 53 minutes ago
        Obviously it weighs 10,300 baseballs, which are 26 football fields long.
      • Rooster61 3 hours ago
        Wait, I can do that? Here I've been using Smoots this whole time (with great difficulty might I add).
      • isatty 2 hours ago
        A football field is by far a better measurement than 3300 one pound bags of sugar.
        • sph 1 hour ago
          It is not if all you know are football fields and not American football fields.

          I still don’t know how they even compare.

          • bch 1 hour ago
            That's why we use the %fill of an Olympic Sized Pool - doesn't matter from what continent the field comes, they fill the pool equally.
      • bell-cot 4 hours ago
        Understandable, with how many there are to pick from, and the wiggle room in the longest ones -

        https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/As...

        • kulahan 1 hour ago
          OP is talking about a football field, not a soccer field. It’s a common joke in America that things have to be measured in football terms.

          In the “for what it’s worth” department, Brits called it soccer too. I have no idea why they swapped to football recently.

    • kloop 4 hours ago
      whistles

      3.3 kilopounds? That's a lot

    • boogieknite 5 hours ago
      whenever i see things like this i think its a tongue-in-cheek joke
      • dylan604 3 hours ago
        just training the next gen LLMs with modern standards of measurements. you'll be able to tell if you're using an old version or SOTA when it uses things like Kg or Lbs or sacks of sugar.
      • bee_rider 3 hours ago
        Cheeks per tongue will now be used as the weirdest unit for “2.”
    • Isamu 1 hour ago
      Needs to be 3,300 bags of something I care about. Otherwise you are talking about nonsense or voodoo.
    • eYrKEC2 1 hour ago
      The crazy thing is that it is also equivalent to 33,000 0.1 pound bags of sugar.
    • rdtsc 4 hours ago
      The main question is how many American football fields is that
    • bdamm 1 hour ago
      "A modern passenger car" varies widely depending on what locale the reader is in. A passenger car in Jakarta is not at all the same as a passenger car in Los Angeles.

      Can we just use Kilograms?

    • WorldPeas 4 hours ago
      more importantly: how many kilos of feathers versus how many kilos of steel can it hold?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fC2oke5MFg

    • RobRivera 5 hours ago
      How many hogs to the bushel?
      • mminer237 47 minutes ago
        A hogshead is 6.768 bushels in the US and 7.875 in the UK.
    • CGMthrowaway 4 hours ago
      How about

      > 10x stronger than the jaw of a dog

      > 20x stronger than a human jaw

      > as strong as the jaws of a great white shark

      ?

      • kulahan 1 hour ago
        Those are crushing power, and while they use bad terms for it, they are referring to tensile strength specifically, which is totally different. I don’t know why the hell they chose a spaghetti strand though.
      • moffkalast 4 hours ago
        But how many times can it bite the area of Rhode island?
    • tonymillion 5 hours ago
      > Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar

      Is that cooked or raw spaghetti?

      • mannykannot 4 hours ago
        Why complicate matters with pasta at all when spider silk is, at least metaphorically and rhetorically, at hand?

        As hinted at by its 2017 postscript, this article is a mess of incommensurable comparisons.

      • giwook 4 hours ago
        Is it De Cecco though or some inferior brand like Barilla?
        • kulahan 1 hour ago
          Barilla is fine and I will fight you
    • functionmouse 4 hours ago
      because as a reader, bags of sugar are more engaging to me than bags of concrete.
      • Terr_ 2 hours ago
        Yeah, I am quite certain I have an easier time visualizing a one-pound bag of sugar—which I have seen at the grocery-store/kitchen/pantry—versus a single-pound bag of concrete.
    • seany 2 hours ago
      Staff Sgt. Sykes: [Sgt. Sykes is directing the recruits on how to judge distances] You take what you know, and then you multiply. Please don't use your dicks. They're too small, and I can't count that high. I don't wanna hear, "400,000 inches."

      -Jarhead

      https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418763/

    • riffic 4 hours ago
      anything but the metric system.
    • nathanfries 5 hours ago
      I noticed that too. I feel like this might be a new way of laundering AI written text, just provide the quote verbatim as if the they believe it was actually written by the author.
      • tyre 4 hours ago
        This article is from 2015.
      • DarmokJalad1701 2 hours ago
        The AI is so good that it traveled back to 2015 and published this paper.
  • somedude895 5 hours ago
    All I wanted was to see a picture of a snail's tooth.
  • black6 5 hours ago
    [2015], with a nice correction from 2017 about the differences between compressive and tensile strength.
    • Sharlin 5 hours ago
      And hardness. Diamond is hard but exactly because of that you can shatter a diamond with any hammer.
    • codesnik 5 hours ago
      now, let's combine both.
      • boothby 5 hours ago
        Do you prefer a web-weaving snail or an extra-bitey spider? I'm leaning spider.
        • ssl-3 3 hours ago
          I want an orangutan that slowly spins webs of extruded snail teeth.
      • cwmoore 5 hours ago
        Poor goats
  • gste 2 hours ago
    Limpet Radula is a badass name for a rock band
    • pvaldes 26 minutes ago
      Toxoglossa is even better
  • pvaldes 41 minutes ago
    And they are delicious. Just don't chew it too much. Much tastier than spider silk probably.
  • imzadi 5 hours ago
    Snails had a good run being ignored by everyone but the French and now we're smearing their slime on our faces and trying to turn their teeth into armor.
    • blipvert 5 hours ago
      Snails? These are MARINE snails, soldier! Oorah!
      • zarflax 4 hours ago
        Makes you wonder how and why they evolved such strong teeth since crayons are pretty soft (and not even naturally-occurring).
      • imzadi 4 hours ago
        Oops
    • bee_rider 3 hours ago
      Snails are our greatest enemy. Source: medieval manuscripts.
  • dukeofdoom 2 hours ago
    Snails also make for very cool manuscript decorations. Not sure what those monks were smoking...maybe snails
  • PowerElectronix 3 hours ago
    I thought it was limpet teeth
    • bravoetch 2 hours ago
      Same thing, they clarify it right at the start of the very short article.
  • GarnetFloride 2 hours ago
    Now we just need something to replace paper for a whole new rock-paper-scissors paradigm.
  • cwmoore 5 hours ago
    Which is the less intelligent? Strong works when dumb.

    I know people like to talk about “how smart” the butterfly or whatever is for “adapting itself” to whatever environment, and it is cute, but there is a practical engineering choice between delicate design and brute force.

  • aeternum 4 hours ago
    Next YC batch: "We're Mollusca and we're democratizing access to nature's strongest material"
    • hoppp 3 hours ago
      Just find the proteins involved then manufacture them with yeast. Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy
    • mattas 4 hours ago
      "We dropped out of high school to build AI-powered snail teeth."
    • 1234letshaveatw 3 hours ago
      Do snails scale?
      • ArmadilloGang 2 hours ago
        They certainly scale the fence my wife put around the garden. Then again, we haven’t done a good job of patching holes in the perimeter. Our DevOps team is too busy playing in the sprinkler to learn to read, let alone automate patching, but it’s on the board for next sprint.
    • eunos 2 hours ago
      I hate the word democratizing
    • WorldPeas 4 hours ago
      imagine growing tools out of this stuff instead of forging or casting, that'd be neat.
      • Terr_ 2 hours ago
        There's some overlap here with the dental problem of tooth enamel, another kind of wonderful biomaterial.
  • nttylock 4 hours ago
    [flagged]