5 comments

  • ryandrake 1 hour ago
    I couldn't be true. You're telling me that Meta, of all companies, would be careless with user data and privacy? Totally unbelievable!
    • llljk 57 minutes ago
      The ceo who infamously said this

          Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
          Zuck: Just ask.
          Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
          [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
          Zuck: People just submitted it.
          Zuck: I don't know why.
          Zuck: They "trust me"
          Zuck: Dumb fucks.
      
      and suspended the instagram account of protest organizer during its peak? https://www.reuters.com/technology/meta-apologizes-after-sus...

      anyone surprised?

      • nomilk 51 minutes ago
        To be fair, this is every tech company, ever, with extremely rare exceptions.
        • zaptheimpaler 29 minutes ago
          It's not, there are levels of scumbaggery and Meta is one of the absolute worst. Rigging elections all over the world, privacy violations everywhere, actively scheming to get kids addicted to slop media, privacy destroying recording glasses, the list goes on.
        • alex1138 38 minutes ago
          To be "fair", Zuckerberg is a mendacious little prick with a history

          Did the Google guys ever get caught saying that? Or using their power over the company to unsend messages, oh I guess you can't do that with email, but with Messenger you can...

    • tonyhart7 1 hour ago
      the worse part its by design for targeted ads

      its not incompetent, its designed that way

  • omoikane 51 minutes ago
    Lesson here is that the subdomain names can be queried due to passive DNS records, and putting stuff that is not supposed to be guessable in subdomain names is a bad idea.
  • postatic 9 minutes ago
    This is a feature no?
  • viccis 15 minutes ago
    Muse is the most obviously doomed claw-style bot because you already need to segment those things from ANY personal info, and Meta rolls into the room as the journal that will tell everyone what you write in it and says "trust me"

    Part of a huge problem with FAANG companies. You can't be Meta and just ratfuck your users for decades and then ask them to trust you, just like you can't be Amazon and turn your storefront into Temu-lite and expect people to want to order products sight unseen with your Echo shit.

  • Razengan 1 hour ago
    I mean, not to victim blame, but anyone willingly using any Facebook product at this point should know what they're signing up for.
    • wayvey 44 minutes ago
      Unfortunately people are still not that smart or aware of the risks. They should be, but that's not the reality yet.
    • alex1138 37 minutes ago
      Network effects matter and no you can't just 'email/call them'. Not everyone automatically has those. You can get it, but something like FB, loose connections, regaining contact (you literally don't have their email/phone numbers and don't tell me 'oh but you lost touch for a reason'), is a nice thing if its CEO wasn't who he is