22 comments

  • fastily 1 hour ago
    The primary source for the article: https://ddosecrets.org/article/icepick
  • JumpCrisscross 1 hour ago
    Can you search for agents near me?
  • morkalork 24 minutes ago
    So who's going to cross-reference the list with the J6 peeps?
  • tamimio 1 hour ago
    What an interesting times, a hack the “exposes” people who are supposedly and should be publicly known to start with.
    • dbg31415 49 minutes ago
      Right? Let's just keep this list as a list of people who should never hold office, or work in law enforcement ever again once Trump goes.

      "Leaks" like this should just be a FoIA request. Anyone enforcing the law should have their face, and badge number, prominently shown at all times.

      That's how we show that we aren't ashamed of our laws. Any time it takes a mask to do your job... you know you're doing something you ought not be doing.

  • liveoneggs 1 hour ago
    what was the okta config error?
    • eastbound 59 minutes ago
      Just upvoting to emphasize that Okta, SSO and MDM services in general are an extremely major single point of failure. From the point of view of a non-expert in security, it would seem like segmenting the authentication services of companies should be a security requirement.
      • bcvvvy 17 minutes ago
        Dunno why you’re downvoted. You’re not wrong.

        Trusting an SSO system, or anything with security sensitive data on the public internet presents an attack surface with untenable risk when your adversary is thousands of people with LLM tools.

        It’s going to take a lot of this before people realise using someone else’s computer is a pretty fucking stupid idea.

        I mean Entra and Okta got popped. That should have been the point companies looked at this risk and went nope.

  • xvxvx 2 hours ago
    In a note with the files, the hackers wrote, “They have our information, so it's only fair that we have theirs.”

    I mean, they’re not wrong…

  • resters 50 minutes ago
    At first I hoped that fears about ICE abuses were overblown, but then I saw video after video of masked, badge-free agents manhandling and throwing grandmas and elderly/weak people to the ground and generally acting like thugs, stalking immigration courts for people trying to comply, doing nazi salutes, etc. It quickly became clear that ICE is largely made up of KKK or proud boy thugs who see it as a chance to brutalize a vulnerable population that they despise.

    Now that this data has been leaked, identities can be correlated with facial recognition, gait analysis, and other biometrics to conclusively identify the agents who committed crimes. Much of the video footage shows agents flagrantly breaking the law, abusing power, violating the rights of citizens and noncitizens alike.

    Now that his leak has occurred, criminal ICE agents will be brought to justice for many of the crimes committed already, and the data will also inform the prosecution of crimes they will likely commit during the rest of Trump's term in office. Many of the crimes are violations of state law, so there is nothing the executive branch can do to stop the prosecutions.

    • blacklion 37 minutes ago
      Do you really believe in this?

      You can see fate of Guantamo's officers and their chain of command. As far as I remember, nobody was really punished, several people were dismissed, but with full pension.

  • dools 1 hour ago
    Sucked in
  • wigster 1 hour ago
    oh dear
  • ck2 2 hours ago
    Not sure how I feel about this but I am sure about one thing

    There should never ever be a masked police force in this country, it's disgusting

    Think about all the things we've written off in the past two years and faded from the news

    Like military helicopters landing on a city building and them blowing the doors off all the apartments dragging everyone from their apartments

    And all bets are off for the next two years, looks like Dems will get the Senate but even then they can't stop the scorched-earth that is coming

    • drop_star 2 hours ago
      Remember when these people had issues wearing masks (Covid). Now all of a sudden its not a problem.
      • pixelatedindex 2 hours ago
        It feels more like a reverse psyop, like “look we are wearing masks now, isn’t this what you wanted”?

        As long as the sides keep reducing common ground, the farther away from government for the people, by the people we go.

        • wredcoll 41 minutes ago
          Tell me more about how "the sides" are reducing "common ground"?
        • bediger4000 2 hours ago
          Again, let's think of two children fighting over their shares of a cookie. Child A says he should get all of the cookie. Child B says that wouldn't be fair, the cookie should be split evenly, half and half.

          The adult in the room decides to promote common ground, and gives 75% of the cookie to A and 25% to B.

          • denkmoon 1 hour ago
            who exactly is the adult in the room supposed to be in this analogy? There _is_ no adult in the room, just the two children.
            • thrance 1 hour ago
              The adult in the room here is the moralizing "enlightened centrist" that puts bothsideism in every conversation about politics.
              • DeluluDon 22 minutes ago
                Just remember that 1984 is fiction and not an instruction manual. Try not to get too authoritarian over demographics (any and all of them).
      • ck2 2 hours ago
        I am not so sure people started saying "this is fine"

        more like he started 1000 other fires, several each week if not a new one each day to make far worse problems

        It's not just the most corrupt administration, it's the most chaos and definitely by design

        btw all investigations dropped for the execution of two citizens, I mean that's definitely not fine with anyone, just way too many other problems going on now at the same time

        well there's no statute of limitations on murder at least, so 800 more days

        • ryandrake 2 hours ago
          > well there's no statute of limitations on murder at least, so 800 more days

          This assumes The Other Side will do anything if they do get into power. My prediction: A milquetoast moderate leads the (D)'s and declares: "In the interest of unity and moving forward, we will not go after anyone in the previous administration. Let us all hold hands and get past this with minimal drama... They have pinkey promised they will never behave this way again when they get to power, and we believe them."

          • KerrAvon 55 minutes ago
            The Democratic base is way too angry for that to fly this time. If Jeffries tries it he'll be removed as speaker.
            • spencerflem 14 minutes ago
              Democratic politicians are the ones that could remove the speaker, not voters.
        • dabinat 51 minutes ago
          Part of the problem is that the justice system is as slow as molasses. They tried to hold him accountable for things he did in his first term and four years wasn’t long enough.
          • wredcoll 40 minutes ago
            Eh, owning the supreme court helps a lot. It moves pretty quickly when it needs to protect trump.
      • toomuchtodo 1 hour ago
        It's wrong when they feel like it infringes on them, it's okay when it empowers and emboldens them to cause harm to others without repercussions.
    • SchemaLoad 1 hour ago
      There's going to be massive trials over the next few years. So many people are going to have accountability catch back up to them. Maybe not the ultra rich but all these ICE goons shooting people on the street will be held accountable.
    • sheepscreek 1 hour ago
      Anytime I see one I can’t shake off the feeling I got when I first saw Watchmen. I thought “this is so dystopian and bizarre; so out there”. Didn’t have this in my bingo card for the decade.
    • havnagiggle 2 hours ago
      The Senate can hold people in contempt with a 50% vote. So they could do something to reign in the fascists starting January, but I'm not holding my breath. And that's still a long road.
      • ck2 2 hours ago
        Senate has no mechanism to prosecute contempt charges

        That goes to the DOJ, which of course means nothing happens, at least for next 800 days

      • jfengel 1 hour ago
        That opens a can of worms that you're never going to close.

        Maybe this is such an emergency that it's worth the risk. But the risk is extremely high; if you do it to them, even with the best of reasons, they are going to do it back to you for any reason they can think of.

        • anon84873628 1 hour ago
          Hence why it is important to be thorough.

          Plus they will do it anyway. There is no shame or honor regulating their behavior.

          Accountability is what was missed last time and is the only way forward.

        • nilamo 1 hour ago
          Good! Both sides should be prosecuting each other over violating the constitution.
          • wredcoll 36 minutes ago
            Hey remember when we had a 2 (plus?) Year trial over whether or not the president had sex with someone other than his wife? Something about family values or morality or whatever they said at the time?
        • wredcoll 38 minutes ago
          God I am tired of this argument.

          What you're saying is that "we" shouldn't enforce the law because "they" will break the law in response.

          Aside from being inherently morally bankrupt, they'rw already breaking the law.

    • ihsw 2 hours ago
      [dead]
    • mitxela 1 hour ago
      I doubt the Dems in office want to stop any of it
    • nonethewiser 1 hour ago
      Many will say that they wouldn’t need to protect their safety and privacy if they werent doing something wrong.

      But in terms of if its ever appropriate for law enforcement to wear masks, isnt the question if its ever possible to threaten a law enforcement officers safety who isnt doing something wrong?

      The FEDs wear masks in cartel operations all the time and that seems fine.

      • ethin 1 hour ago
        I'm not really sure what your getting at. The entire reason that masked LEs are opposed is because (1) it makes it impossible to hold them to account and (2) it makes it trivial to impersonate any LE (ICE hasn't exactly tried all that hard to make special gear for themselves, just buying what's on EBay and similar, so literally anyone could just buy the same gear they're using and impersonate an ICE officer, and since ICE doesn't like identifying themselves, you would have no immediate way of distinguishing between a random citizen who wants to ruff you up or murder you versus a LEO)
        • KerrAvon 51 minutes ago
          Yup. This is not okay. It should be illegal. Maybe it is, IANAL. This person didn't know whether she was getting arrested or kidnapped or why. On top of which this is unnecessary brutality on the face of it. This needs to stop.

          https://kotaku.com/umamusume-pretty-derby-cosplay-clara-tan-...

          > As she hits the sidewalk, Tan hears what she describes as “a godawful crack” come from her foot, and then realizes she’s being cuffed behind her back. “I’m being kidnapped and I have no idea who these men are,” Tan writes. She’s dragged to an unmarked SUV, thrown in the back, and claims to have heard one of the men say, “This could all have been avoided if you’d just come quietly.”

      • dabinat 38 minutes ago
        They don’t have a right to privacy when they’re at work. The Supreme Court has said it is legal to film officers, including their faces, while carrying out their duties.
  • LightBug1 18 minutes ago
    Whoops a fucking daisy ...

    Snoop on to them... as they snoop on to us, mf's

  • righthand 2 hours ago
    This should already be public information imo.
    • derac 2 hours ago
      Yes, why do we have undercover domestic spies and enforcers? Is that something we want? Vote!
      • mitxela 1 hour ago
        We did vote, we voted for this and got what we voted for.
        • AlexErrant 59 minutes ago
          It still blows my mind he won the popular vote.

          This timeline is fucking _wild_.

          • edoceo 39 minutes ago
            The most popular candidate was "I didn't vote"
            • prophesi 19 minutes ago
              DNC did a great job endorsing that candidate.
        • 2OEH8eoCRo0 1 hour ago
          That's definitely why Trump is -27 net approval.
          • shipman05 1 hour ago
            That's just buyers remorse. He told us how he intended to govern. His opponent told us how he intended to govern. The voters were not mislead.

            (and his approval would be the same mid 40s it always was if gas prices were reasonable)

            • fnordpiglet 1 hour ago
              He’s never achieved a majority vote in any election, FWIW. His claim of a mandate was just as brazen as all the other litany of lies - he’s a lame duck lame duck. The true shame is on the congressional republicans for letting him sully them so deeply and follow him in his self immolation of the entire government and America in the world. The rebuilding will be a major test of the successor, and it’ll be fascinating to see if the Goldwater republicans can become the party of reason again rather than this reality TV idiocracy.
              • wredcoll 44 minutes ago
                > The true shame is on the congressional republicans for letting him sully them so deeply and follow him in his self immolation of the entire government and America

                This is the problem when your entire identity and principles boil down to "doing what the social superior tells you to".

              • exe34 1 hour ago
                This is not idiocracy. It's the prequel. In idiocracy, they understood that they were dumb and put the smart guy in charge.
                • evan_ 1 hour ago
                  for 20 minutes, and then they tried to kill him
            • kayamon 53 minutes ago
              Americans aren't angry because Trump was wrong, they're angry because it's not working.
            • tyromaniac 56 minutes ago
              After denying project 2025 and then carrying it out almost exactly? They were misled.b
              • wredcoll 45 minutes ago
                What?
                • 2OEH8eoCRo0 43 minutes ago
                  During the election Trump denied knowing anything about Project 2025 and he has enacted a lot of it. I dont know why voters trusted him on that but here we are.
                  • wredcoll 35 minutes ago
                    Trump is globally famous for lying. It's possibly his most well known attribute? What's the argument here?
                    • 2OEH8eoCRo0 32 minutes ago
                      The argument is that what he promised and what we got are very different. Saying people voted for this isn't genuine IMO.
          • JumpCrisscross 1 hour ago
            It’s not. It’s because he took inflation to the Moon. If he hadn’t had Hegseth at his side, and hadn’t gone into Iran, he’d probably still be treading water.
          • fnordpiglet 1 hour ago
            And won via a plurality after losing the popular vote in the last election. The least popular president in history can’t win a majority of popular vote. It’s not shocking he’s deeply unpopular, he never was popular. He’s a won twice on a technicality of the republic created to ensure the rural states wouldn’t be dominated by Virginia in the original establishment of the union.

            He’s a pariah everywhere on earth, most especially at home. The sad part is the democrats couldn’t mount a successful campaign against someone so unfit to lead. Now there’s nothing left to do but clean up the mess and undo the terrible harm he has caused and repair what can be once he’s finally out of our hair.

        • _AzMoo 1 hour ago
          Eligible voter turnout in 2024 was <50% for 18-24 year olds, and <65% for 25-44 year olds in the US.
          • deadbunny 1 hour ago
            Unless 100% of people vote it doesnt count as voting?
            • fluidcruft 40 minutes ago
              People who don't vote don't oppose the winner.
            • asanineassasin 1 hour ago
              Any idea is worth entertaining, to avoid the realization the purity spiraling ideology is just as reviled by 90 % of the people as is racism.
          • IgorPartola 1 hour ago
            I think my idea for this is that a candidate doesn’t win the election unless they get more than 50% of all eligible votes, not 50% of the votes cast. If there is no clear winner the seat is vacant, but a new election is scheduled for two weeks later. Districts and states that don’t care to vote simply don’t get a say.
          • Blackthorn 1 hour ago
            The New England Patriots lost the 2026 Superbowl, and that list of losers includes all the second and third stringers who didn't play.
          • _DeadFred_ 1 hour ago
            Because people in safe demographics (non minority, no care about reproductive rights) love to broadcast 'both sides are the same'.
            • NoidFonsense 1 hour ago
              [flagged]
              • airstrike 57 minutes ago
                It was more like Obama was so cool and had so much panache he won despite having an extremely incompetent team...and then both he and his team believed he won because of them and proceeded to self-sabotage the DNC from within.

                To be clear, I'm not excusing him. I think he was very cool indeed but ultimately a weak president that lacked in leadership before and after his term

              • user- 49 minutes ago
                >NoidFonsense.

                This is a dogwhistling incel username.

              • cluckindan 50 minutes ago
                What do you think makes a person left-wing or left-leaning?
              • KerrAvon 58 minutes ago
                oh yeah? which attitudes do you take issue with?
                • airstrike 55 minutes ago
                  Feels like you're trying to bait them instead of engaging in good faith.
    • Revanche1367 43 minutes ago
      If this was in another country that is not predominantly inhabited by people of western/central European heritage, US mainstream media would've been calling these "undercover" agents the "secret police" or "stasi" or some other term heavily connotated with tyranny and oppression.
  • mnd999 1 hour ago
    Boo hoo
  • Arubis 1 hour ago
    Fuck ‘em.
  • bradthebeaverfa 24 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • SaaSPocalypse 47 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • matt3210 2 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • slowin 2 hours ago
      Why would this be tragic? The public absolutely has a right to know who these people are. No one is forcing them to join these organizations.
      • elonsmusk 2 hours ago
        [flagged]
        • pixelatedindex 2 hours ago
          > antifa supporters on HN

          Come again? If you have umbrage against antifa, surely you’re pro fascist?

          > Most Americans remember how we couldn't even question COVID, DEI or kneeling for blacks and support law enforcement efforts

          What do they even have anything to do with each other, except for them being right-wing talking points?

          • DaSHacka 1 hour ago
            > Come again? If you have umbrage against antifa, surely you’re pro fascist?

            Just because they call themselves "antifa" doesn't mean its accurate. If the nazis referred to themselves as the "free puppies for everyone and world peace organization", it would not change anything about the morality of their party or the acts committed by them, despite the name.

    • bix6 2 hours ago
      > obtained from a group calling itself the Department of Peace.
    • phs318u 2 hours ago
      The data is said to have been “vetted and cleaned up” and the front end is designed to navigate the hierarchy.

      The leak was via a compromised Okta SSO login (why anyone still uses them is a complete mystery to me).

  • phs318u 2 hours ago
    This is a dupe. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50280691

    The Techdirt article also links to the searchable front end to the dump.

    https://icepi.cx/

    • paaloeye 2 hours ago
      Not really
      • phs318u 1 hour ago
        Yes really.
        • Jtsummers 1 hour ago
          Per dang in many previous comments, it's not a dupe. Multiple submissions of the same topic are fine, it's only (maybe) a dupe when a discussion starts or it's actually the same submission. You linked to a submission with 0 comments submitted a whopping 15 minutes earlier. This one is the one that got traction, neither is a dupe. If someone submits it again, now that there is a discussion, or submits the same Wired article, then those would be dupes.
        • paaloeye 1 hour ago
          wired vs something I've personally never heard before article vs a few paragraphs + image

          Not really.

        • nvr219 1 hour ago
          Maybe really.
  • TacticalCoder 1 hour ago
    At this rate soon it's going to be very suspicious if someone is not part of any leak ; )
  • morkalork 33 minutes ago
    Awfully convenient happening days before the midterm elections. Is this the precursor to a declaration of emergency? Perhaps after an act violence that was enabled by the leak?
    • iAMkenough 3 minutes ago
      All they have to say is “the voting machines were secured by PHP and eMuhdra certs, and weren’t patched” and SCOTUS will decide the outcome of the elections, like they did with “hanging chads” in 2000.
  • paaloeye 47 minutes ago
    So cool, terrorist Karen can now easily email/LinkedIn/whatever escalate to a skip-level manager if an officer is misbehaving.
    • dlahoda 8 minutes ago
      I can now without leak. 5 top out of 11 levels of managers in leak seems tend to have LinkedIn anyway.
  • sailfast 46 minutes ago
    Whatever your feelings about ICE and this administration, there are probably some undercover folks in real danger at the moment. Probably doing some real work to stop some real abuses that you’d want them to stop. (Not saying all - but likely some / many to be in that program)

    So - while I might agree that secretive domestic organizations like MI5 should not exist and sunlight is good for government, I feel for the families of the folks that might catch a bullet because of this.

    • simoncion 11 minutes ago
      > Whatever your feelings about ICE and this administration, there are probably some undercover folks in real danger at the moment.

      I'll say the same thing that no one with access to a microphone said during the 2013 NSA data leaks:

      What makes you think that the Bad Guys didn't already have access to this information? The folks that should have detected this clearly didn't. [0] Given that the Good Guys didn't learn about this until it was made public, neither they nor we have any idea of knowing how many Bad Guys have been siphoning off this data and for how long.

      [0] In this specific incident, Okta appears to be claiming that there has been no breach despite claims that it is the source of the information. Back in 2013 -given that the NSA would often claim something that would be quickly countered by the publication of yet another leaked document- it was pretty clear that the NSA had little idea of what data had been released to the press.

    • chneu 29 minutes ago
      Hell nah. They signed up for this. They knew exactly what their mission was. Stop defending people who were recruited to deport, and in many cases assault, innocent people.

      Making lame excuses for "the good guys" reinforces that these people are doing good. They arent.

      Your excuse will be used against you as soon as it's convenient to them.

      • reallydoingthis 3 minutes ago
        And who's going to make them pay? You? What do you have planned? Can you take the heat after?