NYC Council passes ban on 'surveillance pricing'

(gothamist.com)

28 points | by jonbaer 2 hours ago

6 comments

  • quotemstr 1 minute ago
    Price controls are always and everywhere a net welfare negative because they interfere with the ability of the market to route resources to their best use.
  • gnabgib 2 hours ago
    NY state did it in June https://gothamist.com/news/ny-lawmakers-vote-to-ban-surveill... (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48443192)

    The part of the headline you dropped (that relies on personal data) is the new part

  • steveBK123 1 hour ago
    So will this impact Uber that does some extremely shady stuff around your profile / phone type / battery life / account history / micro location / etc to tease out level of desperation & price elasticity.
  • iloveyoutwo 1 hour ago
    This is a good step.

    Ban facial recognition by the government on civilians and ban Flock and similar. But they aren't interested in limiting their own power.

  • lavendermon 1 hour ago
    Dynamic pricing seems to be a personalized form of price gouging. It's encouraging to see regulators jump on this quickly and try to nip it in the bud. I can't imagine working on a team that helps enable individual price gouging at a company.